Why the study?
Co-infection with African swine fever virus and classical swine fever virus cannot be ruled out where both are prevalent, making rapid and reliable molecular testing essential.
Does a duplex Taqman real-time PCR assay reliably detect and differentiate CSFV and ASFV compared to standard molecular techniques?
Does a duplex Taqman real-time PCR assay reliably detect and differentiate CSFV and ASFV compared to standard molecular techniques?
A novel duplex RT-qPCR assay provides a robust, rapid, and reliable tool for the simultaneous detection and differentiation of CSFV and ASFV.
The increasing spread of African swine fever (ASF) in recent years and the presence of classical swine fever (CSF) subclinical forms in endemic countries suggests that the possibility of coinfection with ASF virus (ASFV) and CSF virus (CSFV) in pigs cannot be ruled out in areas where both diseases are prevalent. Thus, rapid and reliable diagnosis through molecular testing is essential for the timely implementation of control measures to prevent the spread of these devastating swine diseases. Here, we have coupled two of the most validated PCR assays for the detection of CSFV and ASFV in a single reaction tube. The combination of the two tests for the detection of two target nucleic acids did not affect the analytical sensitivity, and the duplex RT-qPCR assay was comparable with the standard molecular techniques. The detection limits for CSFV RNA and ASFV DNA were 0.12 TCID50/reaction and 0.25 TCID50/reaction, respectively. The test showed high repeatability and reproducibility, the coefficient of variation was below 2%, and excellent performance was demonstrated in clinical samples. The duplex assay shows great potential to become a robust diagnostic tool for the rapid and reliable detection and differentiation of CSFV and ASFV in areas where both viruses may be circulating.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coronado et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: