Key result
The ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) provided accurate cardiac output measurements compared to thermodilution during liver transplantation, with a mean bias of -0.02 L/minute.
Why the study?
Does the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) provide accurate cardiac output measurements compared to thermodilution in patients receiving living donor liver transplantation?
Observational (n=10)
Does the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) provide accurate cardiac output measurements compared to thermodilution in patients receiving living donor liver transplantation?
Mean Difference: -0.02 (95% CI -1.06–1.1)
USCOM provides an accurate, noninvasive alternative to pulmonary artery catheterization for perioperative cardiac output monitoring during liver transplantation.
Supports USCOM for perioperative CO monitoring in liver transplantation; extends validation data but remains hypothesis-generating.
The ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) is a new Doppler device for noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring. The aim of this prospective nonrandomized study was to test the feasibility, perioperative reliability, and clinical applicability of using USCOM as an alternative to pulmonary artery catheterization in recipients of living donor liver transplantation. Thirteen patients scheduled to receive living donor liver transplants were initially recruited. Three were subsequently excluded prior to the commencement of surgery because of technical difficulties in obtaining diagnostic-quality images with USCOM. Ten patients proceeded to be studied. Cardiac output measurements by thermodilution and USCOM were compared at 30-minute intervals throughout the procedure and at 10 specific procedural reference points during the surgery when hemodynamic changes were most likely to be observed. The data were analyzed with Lin's concordance coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. Two hundred ninety paired cardiac output values were obtained from the 10 patients. The concordance between both methods was excellent in 8 patients and satisfactory in 2. Bland-Altman analysis of all data produced a mean bias of - 0.02 L/minute for USCOM, and the 95% limits of agreement were -1.06 to +1.10 L/minute. Further analysis of the 10 reference time points showed minimal bias and high levels of agreement between the methods. We conclude that USCOM provides an accurate and noninvasive method for cardiac output measurement during liver transplantation. It may therefore represent an alternative to pulmonary artery catheter placement with consequent reduction in patient's risk and morbidity associated with catheterization. Liver Transpl 14:1029-1037, 2008.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Living donor liver transplantation (n=10). Ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) vs. Thermodilution via pulmonary artery catheterization was evaluated on Cardiac output measurement agreement (mean bias -0.02 L/minute, 95% CI -1.06 to 1.10). The ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) provided accurate cardiac output measurements compared to thermodilution during liver transplantation, with a mean bias of -0.02 L/minute.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: