Key result
Incidental abnormal findings on pre-TAVI CT scans were present in 57% of patients but were not associated with a significant difference in long-term mortality (p=0.48).
Why the study?
Do incidental abnormal CT scan findings during pre-TAVI assessment impact long-term mortality in patients undergoing TAVI?
Observational (n=138)
Do incidental abnormal CT scan findings during pre-TAVI assessment impact long-term mortality in patients undergoing TAVI?
p-value: p=0.48
Incidental findings on pre-TAVI CT scans are common but do not significantly impact long-term mortality, suggesting they should not unnecessarily delay TAVI treatment.
Incidental pre-TAVI CT findings were not linked to mortality; leaves open whether selective follow-up alters outcomes in future cohorts.
Objectives: The aim of this retrospective series is to describe the prevalence and clinical significance of the incidental findings found during pre-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) work-up and to ascertain the clinical course of such patients. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing TAVI from 2013 to 2015 where a TAVI CT assessment was performed (n=138) were included in the study. All incidental findings that were not expected from the patient's history were discussed at the TAVI multidisciplinary meeting in order to ascertain the clinical significance of said findings and whether they would alter the proposed course of treatment. Mortality data were determined by careful retrospective case note and follow-up appointment analysis. Results: Seventy-eight patients (57%) were found to have incidental findings on pre-TAVI CT scan. The majority of patients had benign pathology with high incidence in particular of diverticular disease, pleural effusions, gallstones, hiatus hernia and degenerative spinal disease. Vascular pathology such as superior mesenteric, renal and iliac artery stenoses and abdominal aortic aneurysm was detected in seven patients. In terms of long-term mortality data, we found no significant difference between those with incidental findings and those without (p=0.48). Survival as assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference between those with and without incidental abnormal CT scan findings (p=0.98). Conclusions: Incidental findings with potential for malignancy are common in an elderly, comorbid population. Ultimately, clinical correlation and prognosis must be swiftly ascertained in order to streamline the patients down the appropriate management pathway while avoiding unnecessary delay for treatment of their aortic stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patel et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI assessment (n=138). Incidental abnormal CT scan findings vs. No incidental abnormal CT scan findings was evaluated on Long-term mortality (p=0.48). Incidental abnormal findings on pre-TAVI CT scans were present in 57% of patients but were not associated with a significant difference in long-term mortality (p=0.48).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: