Key result
Pre-TAVR computed tomography identified 541 incidental diagnoses, with 143 of 155 patients (92.3%) having at least one incidental finding, altering the mean STS-PROM from 8.38% to 9.4%.
Why the study?
Pre-TAVR computed tomography is essential for procedure preparation, but patients frequently receive incidental diagnoses that may affect clinical risk and evaluation.
Observational (n=155)
No
Pre-TAVR computed tomography frequently identifies incidental cardiovascular and noncardiovascular findings that can alter surgical risk assessment.
Pre-TAVR CT incidental diagnoses may refine risk scores; leaves open whether systematic reassessment improves selection or outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is an important therapeutic option for aortic stenosis (AS) patients who have high surgical risk. TAVR is a complex procedure. Proper preparation of the patient is of significant importance for the final success and affects the morbidity and mortality of the TAVR directly. Pre-TAVR computed tomography is one of the corner stones of these preparation steps, and many patients get some incidental diagnoses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this trial, we have investigated 155 patients who had underwent TAVR between February 2013 and March 2017 at Hacettepe University Adult Hospital Cardiology Clinic. RESULTS: Total number of incidental diagnoses was 541, and 451 of them were the first diagnoses. Total number of cardiovascular findings and noncardiovascular findings was 369 and 172, respectively. The most common cardiovascular finding is atherosclerotic heart disease (139, 89.6%). The most common noncardiovascular finding is pulmonary nodule (41, 26.4%). 143 of 155 patients had at least one incidental diagnosis after the reassessment, and 33 different diagnoses were identified with computed tomography. The mean STS-PROM was 8.38% (range 2.8% to 23%), and the mean STS-PROM was calculated 9.4% (range 3.6% to 23%) after the reassessment of computed tomography. CONCLUSION: Preprocedural evaluation is one of the most important steps in TAVR. Computed tomography imaging provides extensive information, not only for procedure planning. Our findings emphasize that computed tomography has a crucial role for the preprocedural evaluation of TAVR candidates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Şahiner et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Aortic stenosis (n=155). Pre-TAVR computed tomography was evaluated on Incidental diagnoses. Pre-TAVR computed tomography identified 541 incidental diagnoses, with 143 of 155 patients (92.3%) having at least one incidental finding, altering the mean STS-PROM from 8.38% to 9.4%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: