Why the study?
Does maternal epidural anesthesia compared to spinal anesthesia affect left ventricular dynamics and catecholamine levels in neonates delivered by elective cesarean section?
Does maternal epidural anesthesia compared to spinal anesthesia affect left ventricular dynamics and catecholamine levels in neonates delivered by elective cesarean section?
Maternal epidural anesthesia with bupivacaine does not negatively affect early neonatal left ventricular dynamics or circulation compared to spinal anesthesia, despite higher catecholamine levels.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports maternal epidural use in cesarean without neonatal LV concerns; leaves open causal confirmation in randomized trials.
Left ventricular systolic time intervals, bupivacaine concentrations, adrenaline and noradrenaline levels were determined in 19 neonates delivered by elective cesarean section. Ten of the cesarean sections were performed under spinal and nine under epidural anesthesia. Plain bupivacaine 0.5% was used for the epidural anesthesia and bupivacaine 0.5% in glucose 8% for the spinals. The noradrenaline and adrenaline levels were higher in the neonates whose mothers received epidural anesthesia. The differences in catecholamine and bupivacaine concentrations were not associated with differences in left ventricular dynamics, or the timing of postnatal circulatory changes. The significant exposure of the neonate to bupivacaine, at maternal epidural anesthesia, seems to have no negative effect on early neonatal circulation in the healthy term infant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hägnevik et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: