Key result
The 3-site Ortho hs-cTnI assay demonstrated significantly lower immunoreactivity to macrocomplexes compared with the Abbott hs-cTnI assay in three patients with suspected macrocomplex interference.
Why the study?
Macrocomplexes can cause discrepant hs-cTn concentrations, and whether 3-site immunoassays consistently yield higher immunoreactivity for macro-cTnI remained contradictory.
Does the Ortho 3-site hs-cTnI immunoassay have lower immunoreactivity to macrocomplexes compared to other hs-cTnI assays in patients with suspected falsely elevated troponin?
Population
3 patients with suspected macrocomplexes as a source of high hs-cTnI by Abbott assay
Comparison
Ortho hs-cTnI assay vs Abbott hs-cTnI and Siemens Dimension EXL assays
Design
Case series
Authors
Loading...
May aid resolution of suspected macro troponin false positives; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Case Report (n=3)
Does the Ortho 3-site hs-cTnI immunoassay have lower immunoreactivity to macrocomplexes compared to other hs-cTnI assays in patients with suspected falsely elevated troponin?
The Ortho 3-site hs-cTnI assay may have lower immunoreactivity to macrocomplexes compared to other assays, which can help resolve clinical dilemmas of falsely elevated troponin.
Kavsak et al. (2020) conducted a case report in Suspected macrocomplex interference in hs-cTnI assays (n=3). Ortho hs-cTnI assay vs. Abbott hs-cTnI assay was evaluated on hs-cTnI concentration and recovery after PEG precipitation. The 3-site Ortho hs-cTnI assay demonstrated significantly lower immunoreactivity to macrocomplexes compared with the Abbott hs-cTnI assay in three patients with suspected macrocomplex interference.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: