Key result
This review highlights various classes of drugs used in the treatment of congestive heart failure and examines clinical trials evaluating mortality, morbidity, and hospitalization rates.
Why the study?
Do various therapeutic agents reduce mortality, morbidity, and hospitalization rates in patients with congestive heart failure?
Do various therapeutic agents reduce mortality, morbidity, and hospitalization rates in patients with congestive heart failure?
This review summarizes the impact of various heart failure therapeutic agents on mortality, morbidity, and hospitalization rates based on clinical trials.
Provides overview of HF drug classes from trials; leaves open need for updated comparisons in contemporary practice.
Congestive heart failure is the leading cause of hospitalizations for patients older than 65 years. There are almost 700,000 new cases of heart failure annually and re-hospitalization rates are as high as 50% within the first few months of initial discharge. These statistics translate to healthcare costs that nearly reached US$40 billion in 2010. Understanding the therapeutic agents that can not only help decrease mortality and morbidity but also decrease the rate of re-hospitalizations is vital in the management of congestive heart failure. Here, the authors highlight the various classes of drugs used in the treatment of heart failure. They then provide a focused review examining the multiple clinical trials that have emphasized the evaluation of mortality, morbidity and hospitalization rates in heart failure patients who are receiving the different types of therapeutic agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parikh et al. (2013) conducted a review in Congestive heart failure. Various classes of therapeutic agents was evaluated on Mortality, morbidity and hospitalization rates. This review highlights various classes of drugs used in the treatment of congestive heart failure and examines clinical trials evaluating mortality, morbidity, and hospitalization rates.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: