Key result
High-frequency, low-voltage vagal nerve stimulation evoked myocardial acetylcholine release mainly via the efferent pathway, whereas low-frequency, high-voltage stimulation depended on the afferent pathway.
Why the study?
Vagal nerve stimulation has been explored as a therapy for chronic heart failure, but the contribution of the afferent pathway to myocardial interstitial acetylcholine release during stimulation was unclear.
Vagal nerve stimulation induces myocardial acetylcholine release through distinct pathways depending on stimulation parameters, with low-frequency/high-voltage stimulation relying on the afferent pathway.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Preclinical data should not change clinical vagal stimulation practice; leaves open parameter optimization for human acetylcholine release.
Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) has been explored as a potential therapy for chronic heart failure. The contribution of the afferent pathway to myocardial interstitial acetylcholine (ACh) release during VNS has yet to be clarified. In seven anesthetized Wistar-Kyoto rats, we implanted microdialysis probes in the left ventricular free wall and measured the myocardial interstitial ACh release during right VNS with the following combinations of stimulation frequency (F in Hz) and voltage readout (V in volts): F0V0 (no stimulation), F5V3, F20V3, F5V10, and F20V10. F5V3 did not affect the ACh level. F20V3, F5V10, and F20V10 increased the ACh level to 2.83 ± 0.47 ( P < 0.01), 4.31 ± 1.09 ( P < 0.001), and 4.33 ± 0.82 ( P < 0.001) nM, respectively, compared with F0V0 (1.76 ± 0.22 nM). After right vagal afferent transection (rVAX), F20V3 and F20V10 increased the ACh level to 2.90 ± 0.53 ( P < 0.001) and 3.48 ± 0.63 ( P < 0.001) nM, respectively, compared with F0V0 (1.61 ± 0.19 nM), but F5V10 did not (2.11 ± 0.24 nM). The ratio of the ACh levels after rVAX relative to before was significantly <100% in F5V10 (59.4 ± 8.7%) but not in F20V3 (102.0 ± 8.7%). These results suggest that high-frequency and low-voltage stimulation (F20V3) evoked the ACh release mainly via direct activation of the vagal efferent pathway. By contrast, low-frequency and high-voltage stimulation (F5V10) evoked the ACh release in a manner dependent on the vagal afferent pathway.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawada et al. (2020) studied this question. Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) vs. F0V0 (no stimulation) was evaluated on Myocardial interstitial acetylcholine (ACh) release (p=<0.001). High-frequency, low-voltage vagal nerve stimulation evoked myocardial acetylcholine release mainly via the efferent pathway, whereas low-frequency, high-voltage stimulation depended on the afferent pathway.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: