Why the study?
Does intraoperative defibrillation testing identify ineffective shocks and remain safe in patients undergoing ICD procedures?
Population
4,572 consecutive patients undergoing any implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) intervention
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
DT may warrant consideration in complex or upgrade ICD cases; leaves open whether routine testing improves outcomes.
Does intraoperative defibrillation testing identify ineffective shocks and remain safe in patients undergoing ICD procedures?
A 4.2% initial failure rate of intraoperative defibrillation testing suggests it should not be universally abandoned, particularly for complex, non-standard, or upgrade ICD procedures.
Siebel et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: