Why the study?
Does a 50% tilt biphasic waveform improve defibrillation threshold compared to a 65% tilt biphasic waveform in cardiac arrest survivors using a unipolar defibrillation system?
Does a 50% tilt biphasic waveform improve defibrillation threshold compared to a 65% tilt biphasic waveform in cardiac arrest survivors using a unipolar defibrillation system?
Lowering the biphasic waveform tilt from 65% to 50% does not significantly improve defibrillation thresholds in a unipolar single-lead transvenous defibrillation system.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No DFT benefit from 50% versus 65% tilt; confirms waveform equivalence and supports standard 65% tilt in unipolar systems.
BACKGROUND: A unipolar defibrillation system using a single right ventricular (RV) electrode and the active shell or container of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator situated in a left infraclavicular pocket has been shown to be as efficient in defibrillation as an epicardial lead system. Additional improvements in this system would have favorable practice implications and could derive from alterations in pulse waveform shape. The specific purpose of this study is to determine whether defibrillation efficacy can be improved further in humans by lowering biphasic waveform tilt. METHODS: We prospectively and randomly compared the defibrillation efficacy of a 50% and a 65% tilt asymmetric biphasic waveform using the unipolar defibrillation system in 15 consecutive cardiac arrest survivors prior to implantation of a presently available standard transvenous defibrillation system. The RV defibrillation electrode has a 5-cm coil located on a 10.5 French lead and was used as the anode. The system cathode was the active 108 cm2 surface area shell (or "CAN") of a prototype titanium alloy pulse generator placed in the left infraclavicular pocket. The defibrillation pulse derived from a 120-microF capacitor and was delivered from RV-->CAN, with RV positive with respect to the CAN during the initial portion of the cycle. Defibrillation threshold (DFT) stored energy, delivered energy, leading edge voltage and current, pulse resistance, and pulse width were measured for both tilts examined. RESULTS: The unipolar single lead system, RV-->CAN, using a 65% tilt biphasic pulse resulted in a stored energy DFT of 8.7 +/- 5.7 J and a delivered energy DFT of 7.6 +/- 5.0 J. In all 15 patients, stored and delivered energy DFTs were < 20 J. The 50% tilt biphasic pulse resulted in a stored energy DFT of 8.2 +/- 5.4 J and a delivered energy DFT of 6.1 +/- 4.0 J; P = 0.69 and 0.17, respectively. As with the 65% tilt pulse, all 15 patients had stored and delivered energy DFTs < 20 J. CONCLUSION: The unipolar single lead transvenous defibrillation system provides defibrillation at energy levels comparable to that reported with epicardial lead systems. This system is not improved by use of a 50% tilt biphasic waveform instead of a standard 65% tilt biphasic pulse.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poole et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: