Key result
A 50/50 biphasic waveform reduced the atrial defibrillation threshold to 1.06 J compared to 1.34 J with a 65/65 biphasic waveform, though the difference was not statistically significant.
Why the study?
Does a 50% biphasic waveform tilt reduce atrial defibrillation thresholds compared to a 65% tilt in patients undergoing transvenous atrial defibrillation?
Does a 50% biphasic waveform tilt reduce atrial defibrillation thresholds compared to a 65% tilt in patients undergoing transvenous atrial defibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.06% vs 1.34%
p-value: p=not statistically significant
Biphasic waveform tilt modification may affect atrial defibrillation thresholds in individual patients, though overall differences between 50% and 65% tilt were not statistically significant.
Does not support changing tilt settings; leaves open individualized optimization in future atrial defibrillation studies.
Atrial defibrillation can be accomplished using low energy shocks and transvenous catheters. The biphasic waveform tilt required to achieve optimal atrial defibrillation thresholds (ADFTs) is, however, not known. The effect of single capacitor biphasic waveform tilt modification on ADFT was assessed in 20 patients. Following AF induction the defibrillation pulses were delivered between the catheters positioned in the coronary sinus and the right atrium. The single capacitor biphasic waveform shocks, delivered over the same pathways, consisted of 65% tilt (65/65 biphasic waveform) to produce an overall tilt of 88%, or 50% tilt (50/50 biphasic waveform) to produce an overall tilt of 75%. Although 65/65 biphasic waveform delivers more energy, the shorter duration 50/50 biphasic waveform reduced stored energy ADFT 21%, from 1.34 +/- 0.82 J with 65/65 biphasic to 1.06 +/- 0.81 J. These differences were not statistically significant. Nine patients had lower ADFT with 50/50 biphasic waveform while five patients had lower ADFT with 65/65 biphasic waveform. Equivalent reduction in ADFT was seen in the remaining six patients. The ADFT was 0.83 +/- 0.65 J when both tilts were considered. In conclusion, biphasic waveform tilt modification may affect the ADFT in an individual patient. The optimal biphasic waveform for ADFT is not known.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sra et al. (1997) studied Atrial fibrillation (n=20). 50/50 biphasic waveform (50% tilt) vs. 65/65 biphasic waveform (65% tilt) was evaluated on Atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT) (p=not statistically significant). A 50/50 biphasic waveform reduced the atrial defibrillation threshold to 1.06 J compared to 1.34 J with a 65/65 biphasic waveform, though the difference was not statistically significant.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: