Why the study?
Does nifedipine, metoprolol, or diltiazem improve total ischemic load in patients with stable angina pectoris?
Does nifedipine, metoprolol, or diltiazem improve total ischemic load in patients with stable angina pectoris?
Unlike metoprolol and diltiazem, long-term treatment with nifedipine may paradoxically worsen total ischemic load in some patients with stable angina pectoris despite symptom control.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant caution with nifedipine in stable angina; leaves open comparative efficacy versus metoprolol or diltiazem in randomized trials.
In 50 patients with stable effort angina the effect of three drugs, metoprolol, nifedipine, and diltiazem was assessed by analyzing exercise stress test response and ambulatory ECG recordings. Both metoprolol and diltiazem caused a significant increase in time to ischemic threshold during exercise and a significant decrease of maximum ST-segment depression (during exercise and ambulatory ECG monitoring) and in the average number of daily ischemic episodes. Only metoprolol significantly reduced heart rate and rate-pressure product at the ischemic threshold during exercise. In the group of patients treated with nifedipine no significant improvement was observed in exercise tolerance or in number of ischemic episodes/24 h. Moreover, the subset of nonresponders in the two methods was larger than in the other two groups. In some of these patients a clearcut worsening of total ischemic load was observed, despite the control of symptoms. This adverse effect might be attributed to the different consequences of the vasodilatory effect of nifedipine on blood flow through stenosed vessels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Radice et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: