Population
FDA benchmark generic nozzle geometry scaled down to coronary dimensions (D inlet = 12 mm to 3 mm)
Comparison
Pulsatile computational fluid dynamics simulations vs Steady state CFD simulations
Design
Preclinical
Authors
Loading...
Validates computationally cheaper steady-state simulations for coronary hemodynamics when only time-averaged values are needed.
Steady state simulations are valid for hemodynamic analyses of coronary nozzle models if only time-averaged values are needed, potentially saving computational costs.
Stiehm et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: