Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nanonet thin-film transistors (NN-TFTs) based on random or aligned networks of single-wall carbon nanotubes are often regarded as a promising high-performance alternative to amorphous-Si technology for various macroelectronics applications involving sensors and displays. The comparison of NN-TFTs with other competing technologies such as organic, a-Si, and p-Si TFTs, however, has proved difficult as the mobility of these devices (counterintuitively) depends on a host of geometrical parameters such as tube densityD, tube lengthLS, channel lengthLC, tube-tube contactCij, etc. In this letter, we redefine the mobility for NN-TFTs by generalizing the classical definition from a ldquobottom-uprdquo perspective based on a stick percolation model. This new definition would allow a direct comparison of NN-TFT mobilities across different laboratories and with other competing technologies. We also suggest a simple experimental measure of the critical tube-tube contactCijparameter to allow design of optimized transistors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pimparkar et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: