Why the study?
Observational studies suggested hypertension may be a risk factor for breast cancer, motivating an evaluation of whether systolic blood pressure causally influences breast cancer and its subtypes.
Does genetically predicted systolic blood pressure increase the risk of breast cancer in individuals of European ancestry?
Does genetically predicted systolic blood pressure increase the risk of breast cancer in individuals of European ancestry?
This Mendelian randomization study found no evidence to support a causal effect of systolic blood pressure on overall breast cancer or its subtypes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No causal SBP–BC link in MR; challenges observational associations and leaves open confounding by adiposity.
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) is the leading cause of cancer incidence worldwide. Observational studies have suggested that hypertension may be a risk factor for BC. We tested whether systolic blood pressure (SBP) may influence BC and BC subtypes using a Mendelian randomisation (MR) approach. METHODS: We used 334 genetic variants associated with SBP as an instrumental variable. Effect estimates were obtained from the UK biobank (n = 469,767; SNP-exposure estimates) and the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) (122,977 cases and 105,974 controls; SNP-outcome estimates). We assessed BC sub-types including: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive, Luminal-A, Luminal-B, and Luminal-B HER2 negative. We used inverse variance weighted (IVW) as our primary analysis but conducted a series of sensitivity analyses to test the robustness of our findings. We created a restricted subset of SNPs by excluding SNPs associated with body mass index (BMI) and those with small effect sizes on the exposure, we also conducted multivariable mendelian randomisation analysis to control for adiposity as a potential confounder. RESULTS: For each 1 mm/Hg increase in SBP the estimated effect was OR 1.00 (0.93, 1.08) for overall BC, analyses of BC sub-types results also did not support a causal effect of SBP. Similarly, results of our sensitivity analyses did not show strong evidence of an association. CONCLUSION: The results of our study did not support a causal effect of SBP on overall BC or its sub-types.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Awada et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: