Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The current study analyses the effects of endothelin-1 (ET-1) on paw oedema and pleurisy induced by platelet activating factor (PAF) and other inflammatory agents in the mouse. 2. Combined subplantar injection of ET-1 (0.5 pmol/paw) did not modify oedema caused by histamine (1 to 100 mumol/paw), 5-hydroxytryptamine (1 to 100 mumol/paw) or bradykinin (1 to 100 nmol/paw) but markedly inhibited the response to PAF (0.95 to 3.8 nmol/paw). The selective action of ET-1 against PAF-induced (1.9 nmol/paw) oedema was dose-dependent, reaching a maximum at 0.5 pmol/paw and lasted up to 2 h. 3. ET-1 (0.5 pmol/paw) also inhibited paw oedema (3-4 h) caused by zymosan (500 micrograms/paw). In contrast, it did not modify either the early (1-4 h) or late (48-72 h) phases of the oedematogenic response to carrageenin (300 micrograms/paw), when given either together with or 24 h after the carrageenin. 4. Intrathoracic injection of PAF (1.9 nmol/cavity) induced pleurisy characterized by an increase in pleural exudate volume, and in accumulation of Evans Blue which was maximal at 30 min and lasted up to 4 h. When injected together with PAF, ET-1 (0.5 pmol/cavity) virtually abolished PAF-induced pleurisy. 5. It is concluded that ET-1 is a potent inhibitor of PAF-induced inflammation in the mouse. Its mechanism of anti-inflammatory action in this species, in contrast to what has been found in other species, does not appear to derive from its potent vasoconstrictor properties as ET-1, at the doses used, failed to affect oedematogenic responses to other inflammatory mediators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henriques et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: