Key result
AICD improves 2-year survival by an absolute ~33% compared to projected outcomes.
Why the study?
Survival benefit of automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillators in high-risk patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias and left ventricular dysfunction was uncertain.
Does an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator improve survival in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and medication-refractory malignant ventricular arrhythmias?
Cohort (n=70)
No
Does an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator improve survival in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and medication-refractory malignant ventricular arrhythmias?
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators significantly improve survival in high-risk patients with medication-refractory malignant ventricular arrhythmias and LV dysfunction without impairing functional status.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ICDs were associated with higher-than-projected survival in refractory arrhythmia patients; leaves open confirmation of benefit in randomized trials.
Study objective To assess survival after insertion of automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillators in high-risk patients who have malignant ventricular arrhythmias and left ventricular dysfunction. Design Actual survival time compared with arrhythmia-free time in a single group of patients. Setting Inpatient services of a tertiary referral center and outpatient follow-up. Patients Seventy consecutive patients with clinical sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation whose arrhythmia could not be controlled by medication as determined by programmed electrical stimulation, and who had an automatic cardioverter defibrillator implanted. Intervention All patients received an implantable defibrillator. Measurements and main results Two-year survival was 93.4% (95% CI, 87 to 99.8) and projected survival based on recurrence of malignant arrhythmias was 60.3% (CI, 47.3 to 73.3; P less than 0.001). In the 25 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction less than 30%, actual survival was 86.7% (CI, 72.3 to 91.1) and projected survival was 56.9% (CI, 35.9 to 77.9; P = 0.025). Projected survival percentages are similar to survival figures reported in the literature for such high-risk patients. There was only one sudden death; the remaining deaths were not arrhythmic in nature. Of the 65 patients who were alive at the end of follow-up, 13 were in New York Heart Association Class I; 44, Class II; 5, Class III; and 3, Class IV. Conclusions The automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator is probably highly effective in preventing arrhythmic mortality even in high-risk patients. Such treatment does not appear to significantly impair a patient's functional status.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patrick Tchou (1988) conducted a cohort in Left ventricular dysfunction and malignant ventricular arrhythmias (n=70). Automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator vs. Projected survival based on recurrence of malignant arrhythmias (arrhythmia-free time) was evaluated on Two-year survival (p=<0.001). Two-year actual survival in patients receiving an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator was 93.4% compared with a projected survival of 60.3%.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: