Why the study?
Can protein C and protein S levels be accurately determined within 24 hours of diagnosis of acute venous thromboembolism?
Can protein C and protein S levels be accurately determined within 24 hours of diagnosis of acute venous thromboembolism?
Measuring protein C and protein S at the time of diagnosis of acute venous thromboembolism yields mostly normal results with uncommon false positives, challenging the common practice of delaying these tests.
Early protein C/S testing in acute VTE may be reliable in most patients; leaves open whether guidelines should revise delayed testing recommendations.
In the 50% of cases of acute idiopathic venous thromboembolism, laboratory testing for inherited causes is often performed. Most physicians are under the impression that assays for protein C and protein S should not be measured at the time of diagnosis because of a high false positive rate. We performed a prospective cohort study from two outpatient thromboembolism clinics on consecutive patients with an objectively confirmed diagnosis of first acute idiopathic venous thromboembolism. Assays for protein C and protein S were performed prior to the initiation of oral anticoagulation therapy and within 24 h of diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. Abnormal results were repeated when patients discontinued oral anticoagulant therapy. Of 253 patients tested for both protein C and protein S, 229 (91%; 95% confidence interval 87-94%) were negative and 484 of 508 (95%) tests were normal. Of the 24 initial abnormal results, 21 were repeated and 10 (48%; 95% confidence interval 26-70%) were still abnormal. Overall, 97.8% of initial protein C and protein S results were accurate. If protein C and protein S are measured at the time of diagnosis of acute venous thromboembolism, the majority of the results will be normal and false positives are uncommon.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kovacs et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: