Why the study?
Does catheter-directed thrombolysis improve symptoms and pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with severe thromboembolic disease failing standard heparin therapy?
Does catheter-directed thrombolysis improve symptoms and pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with severe thromboembolic disease failing standard heparin therapy?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Catheter-directed thrombolysis with urokinase may be a viable and safe option for pregnant women with severe thromboembolic disease failing standard heparin therapy.
Anticoagulation with intravenous heparin has been the standard treatment for the management of gestational thromboembolic complications. Catheter-directed thrombolysis is an encouraging approach for the treatment of thromboembolic disease and has not been previously reported during pregnancy. One gravid woman with pulmonary embolism, critically ill, and hemodynamically compromised, and two gravid women with iliofemoral venous thrombosis, who failed to respond to standard treatment with intravenous heparin, were treated with catheter-directed urokinase. All three patients experienced rapid resolution of symptoms and successful pregnancy outcomes. In our three patients, catheter-directed thrombolysis for thromboembolic disease during pregnancy allowed rapid resolution of hemodynamic abnormalities and/or resolution of thrombus. Catheter-directed thrombolysis offered a reasonably safe alternative to prolonged medical management in these young, otherwise healthy, patients. Long-term, it may prevent the postphlebitic syndrome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krishnamurthy et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: