Why the study?
Does oral anticoagulation reduce stroke and death in patients with atrial fibrillation in a general practice cohort?
Does oral anticoagulation reduce stroke and death in patients with atrial fibrillation in a general practice cohort?
In a UK general practice cohort, OAC significantly reduced stroke and death in AF patients, yet remained underutilized in approximately 40% of high-risk individuals.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OAC use was associated with lower stroke and death in primary care AF; supports further trials but should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is recommended for effective stroke prevention in the majority of atrial fibrillation patients but is often under-utilised. AIM: To use the Guidance on Risk Assessment and Stroke Prevention in the Atrial Fibrillation (GRASP-AF) tool to risk stratify patients, identify antithrombotic therapy received, and determine predictors of stroke and death in a UK general practice cohort. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective-observational cohort study in 11 general practices in Darlington, England, with 105 000 patients. METHOD: The study included patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) identified from GP databases using the GRASP-AF tool. Stroke risk was determined by CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores. RESULTS: A total of 2259 (2.15%) patients with AF (mean age 76 years [SD 12]; 46% female) were identified. Use of CHA2DS2-VASc rather than CHADS2 increased the proportion eligible for OAC from 86.0% to 92.5%. Of those with CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥2, 39.7% were not receiving appropriate OAC, and of those with CHADS2 score of ≥1, 39.5% were not receiving appropriate OAC. Antiplatelet monotherapy was utilised in 33-40% of patients at high risk of stroke. During 12-month follow-up, 67 (3.0%) patients experienced a stroke and 214 (9.5%) died. Use of OAC significantly reduced stroke risk (odds ratio [OR] 0.60, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 0.45 to 0.81) and death (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.38 to 0.75, P<0.001) among patients at moderate-high risk of stroke. Use of antiplatelet agents also independently predicted death (OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.50 to 0.94; P = 0.020). CONCLUSION: Most patients with AF in general practice are at high risk of stroke, but OAC is under-utilised in about 40%. Risk of stroke and death was significantly reduced by OAC, yet antiplatelet monotherapy was inappropriately used in approximately 25% of patients at risk of stroke. Optimal implementation of the CHA2DS2-VASc score in the GRASP-AF tool could help prevent more strokes annually.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shantsila et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: