Why the study?
Does intraoperative measurement using a pacing guidewire correlate with final LV lead pacing and sensing values in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Does intraoperative measurement using a pacing guidewire correlate with final LV lead pacing and sensing values in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
A pacing guidewire accurately predicts final LV lead pacing and sensing thresholds, potentially facilitating optimal target vessel selection and reducing procedure time during CRT implantation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid vessel selection during CRT implantation; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative measurements of left ventricular (LV) pacing and sensing values were assessed using a novel 0.014-inch guidewire (Visionwire, Biotronik GmbH, Berlin, Germany) enabling pacing and sensing at the distal tip before final LV lead implantation. METHODS: Twenty-two consecutive patients selected for cardiac resynchronization therapy were studied. RESULTS: Significant correlation was found between the LV pacing threshold as assessed by the Visionwire and values after final LV lead implantation (r = 0.92, P < 0.001). Correlation for LV sensing was also significant (r = 0.72, P < 0.001). No significant correlation was present with respect to phrenic nerve stimulation. However, no phrenic nerve stimulation at 10 V/0.5 ms using the Visionwire identified 88% of patients without phrenic nerve stimulation at 10 V/0.5 ms with subsequent LV lead measurements. CONCLUSION: This technique may facilitate transvenous LV lead implantation by preventing implantation in a unsuitable target vessel with respect to pacing and sensing values or phrenic nerve stimulation, thereby reducing procedure and fluoroscopy time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cock et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: