Eighteen site-selective cAMP analogs modified at either the C-8 position or the C-6 position were tested for their growth regulatory effects on the Harvey murine sarcoma virus-transformed NIH/3T3 clone 13-3B-4 cells grown in a serum-free defined medium. All 18 analogs, when tested individually, exhibited an appreciable growth inhibitory effect at micromolar concentrations. The most potent growth inhibitory analogs contained a thio moiety at the C-8 position. In general, C-6 analogs required 5-10-fold greater concentrations than C-8 analogs to produce the same degree of growth inhibition. The growth inhibition induced by these analogs was accompanied by a change in cell morphology; cells treated with the analogs exhibited the morphology characteristic of untransformed fibroblasts, while untreated cells retained a transformed phenotype. The regulatory subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase, the cAMP receptor protein, has two different intrachain cAMP binding sites, and cAMP analogs modified at the C-8 position (C-8 analogs) are generally selective for Site 1, while analogs modified at the C-6 position (C-6 analogs) are generally selective for Site 2. Thus, C-8 and C-6 analogs were tested in combination to enhance the growth regulatory effect. Both growth inhibition and morphological change were enhanced synergistically by a combination of the C-6 and C-8 analogs. Two C-6 analogs or two C-8 analogs added together did not cause synergism. For both growth inhibition and phenotypic change, C-8 thio analogs acted far more synergistically than C-8 amino analogs when cells were treated in combination with C-6 analogs, suggesting a response of the RII rather than the RI cAMP receptor protein. DEAE-cellulose chromatography revealed that the growth inhibition, in fact, correlates with an increase of the RII cAMP receptor protein and a decrease of the RI receptor protein. The growth inhibitory effect of the site-selective analogs was not due to the cytotoxic effect of adenosine metabolites as shown by the different behavior of 8-Cl-cAMP compared with 8-Cl-adenosine in 1) cell cycle effects and 2) release from growth inhibition. It is concluded that the observed growth inhibition and phenotypic reversion of 13-3B-4 cells is most likely mediated through the cellular effector, the RII cAMP receptor protein.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tagliaferri et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: