Why the study?
Does a combination biomarker algorithm using H-FABP and hs-cTnT improve the rule-out of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain compared to the standard ESC algorithm?
Does a combination biomarker algorithm using H-FABP and hs-cTnT improve the rule-out of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain compared to the standard ESC algorithm?
A combination algorithm using H-FABP and hs-cTnT significantly improves the early rule-out of acute myocardial infarction in emergency department patients compared to the standard ESC algorithm.
May improve early AMI rule-out in ED chest pain; hypothesis-generating, requiring prospective validation before practice change.
Background: Chest pain of suspected cardiac origin is a common complaint for presentation at the emergency department; however only 10% to 13% of patients will have acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study examined a decision support ‘rule-out’ algorithm to stratify risk of AMI in these patients. Methods: Five hundred and forty-eight patients with chest-pain of suspected cardiac origin were recruited. Blood samples were collected at presentation (t=0) and after 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h. Serum troponin I, heart-type fatty acid bindingprotein (H-FABP), myoglobin, carbonic anhydrase III (CAIII), creatine phosphokinase MB isoenzyme (CKMB)and glycogen phosphorylase isoenzyme BB (GPBB) were measured using the Randox Cardiac Plus Array; Troponin T (cTnT), high sensitivity troponin T (hs-cTnT), high sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP), NT-pro-BNP, total cholesterol, and HDL were measured using a Modular P Analyser. Clinical and demographic information was recorded for each patient. Results: For biomarker analysis, STEMIs were excluded, leaving 360 patients at presentation (72 NSTEMI and 288 non-AMI) and 320 patients at 1 h (66 NSTEMI and 254 non-AMI). A rule-out algorithm was developed based onH-FABP and hs-cTnT. When the H-FABP hs-cTnT combination algorithm was applied to the data, 106 additional patients at presentation were identified as non-AMI compared to the standard ESC algorithm, 189/288 (65.6%) vs.83/288 (28.8%) (p<0.0005), respectively. Furthermore, the H-FABP hs-cTnT combination algorithm, identified 71% of non-AMI patients at 1 hour with no false negatives. Conclusion: Deployment of the H-FABP hs-cTnT combination algorithm at the emergency department could assist in the identification of non-AMI patients at presentation with the potential to reduce the number of hospital admissions by 106/288 (36.8%). Using the H-FABP hs-cTnT combination algorithm would have a significant impact on patient health ensuring that the appropriate care and efficient use of resources are directed to patients identified as high risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Navarro et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: