Why the study?
Does a higher dose of dark chocolate (25 g/day) reduce blood pressure more than a lower dose (6 g/day) in high-risk patients with prehypertension or stage 1 hypertension?
Does a higher dose of dark chocolate (25 g/day) reduce blood pressure more than a lower dose (6 g/day) in high-risk patients with prehypertension or stage 1 hypertension?
Higher doses of dark chocolate (25 g/day) do not provide additional blood pressure-lowering benefits compared to low doses (6 g/day) but may lead to slight weight gain.
Higher-dose dark chocolate yields no additional BP reduction; challenges dose-response assumptions and supports lower dosing to limit calories.
BACKGROUND: Dark chocolate may have blood pressure-lowering properties. We conducted a prospective randomized open-label blinded end-point design trial to study a potential dose dependency of the presumed antihypertensive effect of dark chocolate by directly comparing low vs. higher doses of dark chocolate over the course of 3 months. METHODS: We enrolled a total of 102 patients with prehypertension/stage 1 hypertension and established cardiovascular end-organ damage or diabetes mellitus. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 6 or 25 g/day of flavanol-rich dark chocolate for 3 months. The difference in 24-h mean blood pressure between groups was defined as the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: Significant reductions in mean ambulatory 24-h blood pressure were observed between baseline and follow-up in both groups (6 g/day: -2.3 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval -4.1 to -0.4; 25 g/day: -1.9 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval -3.6 to -0.2). There were no significant differences in blood pressure changes between groups. In the higher-dose group, a slight increase in body weight was noted (0.8 kg, 95% confidence interval 0.06 to 1.6). CONCLUSIONS: The findings are consistent with the hypothesis that dark chocolate may be associated with a reduction in blood pressure (BP). However, due to the lack of a control group, confounding may be possible and the results should be interpreted with caution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Desch et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: