Why the study?
Does the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test (RSVT) predict fluid responsiveness better than filling pressures in ventilated patients after major vascular surgery?
Does the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test (RSVT) predict fluid responsiveness better than filling pressures in ventilated patients after major vascular surgery?
The Respiratory Systolic Variation Test (RSVT) may be a useful standardized ventilatory maneuver to predict fluid responsiveness better than filling pressures in ventilated patients.
RSVT slope may better indicate fluid responsiveness than filling pressures after vascular surgery; leaves open need for randomized validation in ventilated patients.
In Brief Respiratory-induced changes in arterial blood pressure predict fluid responsiveness. However, the accuracy of these variables is affected by the preset tidal volume and by the early inspiratory increase in arterial blood pressure. We have therefore calculated the slope produced by the minimal systolic blood pressures (plotted against the respective airway pressures) during a ventilatory maneuver consisting of four incremental, successive, pressure-controlled breaths, termed the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test (RSVT). In 14 ventilated patients, after major vascular surgery, the slope of the RSVT decreased significantly after intravascular fluid administration and correlated with the end-diastolic area and with changes in cardiac output better than filling pressures. This preliminary study suggests that a standardized ventilatory maneuver may be useful in guiding fluid therapy in ventilated patients. IMPLICATIONS: The slope created by the minimal systolic blood pressures plotted against the respective airway pressures during a ventilatory maneuver consisting of four incremental successive breaths was shown to predict the response of the cardiac output intravascular to fluid administration better than frequently used variables in ventilated patients after vascular surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perel et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: