Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In Jeremy Waldron’s book, The Harm in Hate Speech, it is not always clear whether he argues that hate speech causes harm or whether it constitutes harm. This article considers this uncertainty, concluding that the best understanding of Waldron’s argument is that hate speech tends to cause harm - a weak form of the consequentialist case for its proscription. His argument is not advanced by his apparent reliance on speech-act theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eric Barendt (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: