Key result
Flexible light wand guided tracheal intubation resulted in significantly lower stress reaction indicators (HR, MAP, GLU, COR) at 5 minutes post-intubation compared to traditional laryngoscope and ILMA.
Why the study?
Does flexible light wand guided tracheal intubation reduce stress reaction compared to traditional laryngoscope and intubation laryngeal mask in patients undergoing gynecologic operation with general anesthesia?
RCT (n=90)
Randomly divided
Does flexible light wand guided tracheal intubation reduce stress reaction compared to traditional laryngoscope and intubation laryngeal mask in patients undergoing gynecologic operation with general anesthesia?
Flexible light wand guided tracheal intubation reduces physiological stress reactions compared to traditional laryngoscope and intubation laryngeal mask during gynecologic operations under general anesthesia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May favor flexible light wand in gynecologic anesthesia protocols; extends intubation device trials to physiologic stress endpoints.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
铭 陈 (2014) conducted an RCT in Gynecologic operation with general anesthesia (n=90). Flexible light wand guided tracheal intubation vs. Traditional laryngoscope (MAC) and intubation laryngeal mask (ILMA) was evaluated on Stress reaction indicators (HR, MAP, GLU, COR) (p=<0.05). Flexible light wand guided tracheal intubation resulted in significantly lower stress reaction indicators (HR, MAP, GLU, COR) at 5 minutes post-intubation compared to traditional laryngoscope and ILMA.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: