Key result
A national survey of 235 intensive care medicine trainees revealed a high desire for research activities but identified multiple barriers to participation.
Cross-Sectional (n=235)
Yes
Intensive care medicine trainees have a high desire for research activities but face multiple barriers, highlighting the need for structural initiatives to improve access to research opportunities.
May warrant initiatives to address trainee barriers; leaves open effects on research output and ICU care.
Research is key to intensive care practice but it is not certain whether trainees get the research experience they want to prepare them for clinical practice as consultants. We distributed a survey via Research & Audit Federation of Trainees to 478 current intensive care medicine trainees to establish their views. We restricted analysis to regions with an 80% or greater response rate ( n = 235 responses) to reduce self-selection bias. Our results indicated that the desire for research activities was high but multiple barriers exist. We suggest simple initiatives combined with engagement of trainee research networks and local Clinical Research Networks to improve trainee access to research opportunities. Greater freedom to participate in research activities could be created by broader ARCP clinical governance requirements, flexible interpretation of the FICM curriculum and support of trainees wishing to use their non-clinical time for projects. A resource detailing local research activity and appropriate contacts could help trainees plan suitable activities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shaw et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Intensive care medicine trainees (n=235). Survey on research needs and barriers was evaluated on Desire for research activities and barriers. A national survey of 235 intensive care medicine trainees revealed a high desire for research activities but identified multiple barriers to participation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: