Protective ballooning technique for prevention of side branch occlusion in coronary nonleft main true bifurcation lesions: A single‐center study

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a protective ballooning technique in preventing side branch (SB) occlusion and to assess the long-term clinical outcomes for coronary nonleft main true bifurcation lesions. BACKGROUND: SB occlusion is a major complication associated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary bifurcation lesions. METHODS: Patients were consecutively enrolled and randomly assigned to protective ballooning technique or jailed wire technique group. Periprocedural and long-term clinical outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Patients in the protective ballooning technique (n = 173) and jailed wire technique (n = 167) groups were followed up for 12 months. SB occlusion occurred in one patient (0.6%) and nine patients (5.4%) in each group, respectively. The proportion of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3 of the SB was higher in the protective ballooning technique group (98.8% vs. 95.2%, p < 0.05). SB rewiring was necessary in one patient in the protective ballooning technique group (0.6%) with provisional stenting, significantly lower than that in the jailed wire technique group (seven patients, 4.2%; p = 0.03). Periprocedural myocardial infarction occurred in three (1.73%) and six (3.59%) patients in the protective ballooning technique and jailed wire technique groups without significant difference, respectively. Major adverse cardiovascular events at 12 months were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Protective ballooning technique is effective for the prevention of SB occlusion in nonleft main true bifurcation lesions and had favorable long-term outcomes at the 12-month follow-up.