Key result
Three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography showed a bias of -1.2 ml and 20% error versus pulmonary artery catheter, but was unreliable for tracking dynamic stroke volume changes.
Why the study?
Does three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography accurately measure stroke volume and track haemodynamic changes compared to a pulmonary artery catheter in cardiac surgery patients?
Observational (n=40)
Does three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography accurately measure stroke volume and track haemodynamic changes compared to a pulmonary artery catheter in cardiac surgery patients?
Three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography is acceptable for static stroke volume measurement but insufficiently reliable for tracking dynamic changes after haemodynamic interventions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
3D TEE may suffice for static SV but not dynamic tracking in cardiac surgery; leaves open validation versus PAC in perioperative cohorts.
Measurement of left ventricular stroke volume and cardiac output is very important for managing haemodynamically unstable or critically ill patients. The aims of this study were to compare stroke volume measured by three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography with stroke volume measured using a pulmonary artery catheter, and to examine the ability of three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography to track stroke volume changes induced by haemodynamic interventions. This study included 40 cardiac surgery patients. Haemodynamic variables were measured before and 2 min after haemodynamic interventions, which consisted of phenylephrine 100 μg or ephedrine 5 mg. We used Bland-Altman analysis to assess the agreement between the stroke volume measured by three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography and by the pulmonary artery catheter. Polar-plot and 4-quadrant plot analyses were used to assess the trending ability of three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography compared with the pulmonary artery catheter. Bias and percentage error were -1.2 ml and 20%, respectively. The concordance rate in the 4-quadrant analysis after phenylephrine and ephedrine administration was 75% and 84%, respectively. In the polar-plot analysis, the angular concordance rate was 66% and 73% after phenylephrine and ephedrine administration, respectively. Three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography was clinically acceptable for measuring stroke volume; however, it was not sufficiently reliable for tracking stroke volume changes after haemodynamic interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suehiro et al. (2014) conducted an observational in cardiac surgery (n=40). three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography vs. pulmonary artery catheter was evaluated on agreement and trending ability of stroke volume measurement. Three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography showed a bias of -1.2 ml and 20% error versus pulmonary artery catheter, but was unreliable for tracking dynamic stroke volume changes.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: