This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short noncoding RNAs that post-transcriptionally regulate gene expression. Their canonical function depends on a "seed" sequence at the miRNA 5' end that pairs with conserved sites in the 3' untranslated regions of target messenger RNAs to suppress gene expression. Although seed-mediated targeting is well characterized, the role of the miRNA 3' end remains poorly understood and is challenging to study. Here, we identify a noncanonical mechanism by which miR-106a, a member of the miR-17 family, competes with let-7a for binding to let-7 target sites despite their distinct seed sequences. This binding bypasses miR-106a seed pairing and instead relies on extensive complementarity at its 3' end, which shares sequence identity with the let-7a seed. Such binding of miR-106a does not itself silence these targets but shields them from let-7-mediated suppression, resulting in de-repression of let-7 targets. By contrast, miR-106b, which differs from miR-106a and the other miR-17 family members at its 3' end, lacks this de-repressive activity. These findings show that variation in miRNA 3' sequences can generate divergent functions within a miRNA family and underscore the need to account for 3'-end contributions when interpreting miRNA-target networks and considering the development of miRNA-based therapeutics.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Łaski et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: