Key result
In Asian patients with HFmrEF, diabetes mellitus increased all-cause mortality in both sexes, though the association was less strong in women (HR 1.234) compared to men (HR 1.290, P-interaction<0.001).
Why the study?
The impact of sex and diabetes mellitus on patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction was not well elucidated.
Does diabetes mellitus and sex affect all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in Asian patients with HFmrEF?
Observational (n=2,272)
Yes
Does diabetes mellitus and sex affect all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in Asian patients with HFmrEF?
Hazard Ratio: 1.234 (95% CI 1.032–1.476)
Absolute Event Rate: 64.3% vs 57.5%
p-value: p=0.021
In Asian patients with HFmrEF, diabetes is a potent disease modifier with distinct sex differences, conferring a higher risk of combined cardiovascular mortality and heart failure readmission in women compared to men.
Sex differences in DM-associated HFmrEF risks may inform Asian patient stratification; hypothesis-generating for sex-specific interventions.
Introduction: The impact of sex and diabetes mellitus (DM) on patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) is not well elucidated. This study aims to evaluate sex differences in the clinical profile and outcomes in Asian HFmrEF patients with and without DM. Methods: Patients admitted nationally for HFmrEF (ejection fraction 40–49%) between 2008 and 2014 were included and followed up until December 2016. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular (CV) death and/or heart failure (HF) rehospitalisations. Results: A total of 2,272 HFmrEF patients (56% male) were included. More women had DM than men (60% versus 55%, P=0.013). Regardless of DM status, HFmrEF females were older, less likely to smoke, had less coronary artery disease, narrower QRS and lower haemoglobin compared to men. The odds of having DM decreases in smokers who are women as opposed to men (Pinteraction =0.017). In multivariate analysis, DM reached statistical analysis for all-cause mortality and combined CV mortality or HF rehospitalisation in both men and women. However, the results suggest that there may be sex differences in terms of outcomes. DM (vs non-DM) was less strongly associated with increased all-cause mortality (adjusted hazards ratio [adj HR] 1.234 vs adj HR 1.290, Pinteraction <0.001] but more strongly associated with the combined CV death/HF rehospitalisation (adj HR 1.429 vs adj HR 1.317, Pinteraction =0.027) in women (vs men). Conclusion: Asian women with HFmrEF had a higher prevalence of DM, with differences in clinical characteristics, compared to men. While diabetes conferred poor outcomes regardless of sex, there were distinct sex differences. These highlight the need for sex-specific management strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tay et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) (n=2,272). Diabetes mellitus vs. No diabetes mellitus was evaluated on All-cause mortality in women (HR 1.234, 95% CI 1.032-1.476, p=0.021). In Asian patients with HFmrEF, diabetes mellitus increased all-cause mortality in both sexes, though the association was less strong in women (HR 1.234) compared to men (HR 1.290, P-interaction<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: