Why the study?
Does radiofrequency hot balloon ablation prevent atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Does radiofrequency hot balloon ablation prevent atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Radiofrequency hot balloon ablation demonstrates acceptable safety and long-term efficacy for maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support hot balloon ablation for paroxysmal AF; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
INTRODUCTION: Isolation of pulmonary veins (PVs) and the posterior left atrium (LA) can be safely performed by radiofrequency hot balloon (RHB)-based box isolation. However, data on long-term effects for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) by the use of this method remain limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: We treated 238 patients with paroxysmal AF (194 male; age. 62.6 ± 9.4 years) by RHB ablation. During 6.2-year (75 months) follow-up, 154 (64.7%) patients were free from atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATAs) without antiarrhythmic-drugs (AADs). We performed re-ablation in 69 of 84 patients with ATA recurrence (average 1.3 ± 0.6; median 1, total 91 procedures) using a 3D-mapping system and a conventional catheter. The sites of reconnection were observed at the PV in 61 of 69 (88.4%) patients and at the posterior LA in 58 of 69 (84.1%) patients. Finally, during mean follow-up of 4.6 ± 1.6 years, no-ATA episodes were detected in 201 (84.5%) patients without AADs. Independent predictors of ATA recurrence following a single procedure were heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HR: 2.67, 95%CI: 1.40-5.10, P = 0.003) and low estimated glomerular filtration rate (HR: 1.81, 95%CI: 1.11-2.93, P = 0.03; cut-off of 62.0 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). During the follow-up period, there were 4 (1.7%) patients with PV stenosis (>70% reduction in PV diameter); however, none of these cases required intervention. Phrenic nerve palsy was detected in 8 patients (3.4%), but resolved during 3 months in all cases. CONCLUSION: RHB ablation can be effective during a long-term follow-up for patients with paroxysmal AF. Safety outcomes were within an acceptable range.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamaguchi et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: