Why the study?
Does a new regional network organizational model for AMI improve the rate of primary PCI within 24 hours and reduce in-hospital mortality and health inequities in patients with STEMI?
Does a new regional network organizational model for AMI improve the rate of primary PCI within 24 hours and reduce in-hospital mortality and health inequities in patients with STEMI?
Implementation of a regional STEMI network improved timely access to primary PCI and reduced care disparities, but did not uniformly translate to improved in-hospital survival across all patient subgroups.
Cardiovascular diseases are a leading cause of death in Europe. Outcomes in terms of mortality and health equity in the management of patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) are influenced by health care service organization. The main aim of the present study was to examine the impact of the new organizational model of the Veneto Region's network for Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) to facilitate primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on STEMI, and its efficacy in reducing health inequities. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on HDRs in the Veneto Region for the period 2007⁻2016, analyzing 65,261 hospitalizations for AMI. The proportion of patients with STEMI treated with PCI within 24 h increased significantly for men and women, and was statistically much higher for patients over 75 years of age (APC, 75⁻84: 9.8; >85: 12.5) than for younger patients (APC, <45: 3.3; 45⁻64: 4.9), with no difference relating to citizenship. The reduction in in-hospital, STEMI-related mortality was only statistically significant for patients aged 75⁻84 (APC: -3.0 [-4.5;-1.6]), and for Italians (APC: -1.9 [-3.2;-0.6]). Multivariate analyses confirmed a reduction in the disparities between socio-demographic categories. Although the new network improved the care process and reduced health care disparities in all subgroups, these efforts did not result in the expected survival benefit in all patient subgroups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saïa et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: