Why the study?
Radiofrequency renal denervation is under investigation for hypertension with variable success, prompting examination of how ablation biomarkers depend on treatment parameters and anatomic variables.
What are the procedural and anatomical determinants of multielectrode renal denervation efficacy in a preclinical model?
What are the procedural and anatomical determinants of multielectrode renal denervation efficacy in a preclinical model?
Total ablation area and circumferential coverage are the primary determinants of renal denervation efficacy, with increased efficacy at smaller artery diameters.
Preclinical renal denervation thresholds should not change practice; leaves open optimal human electrode configurations.
Radiofrequency renal denervation is under investigation for treatment of hypertension with variable success. We developed preclinical models to examine the dependence of ablation biomarkers on renal denervation treatment parameters and anatomic variables. One hundred twenty-nine porcine renal arteries were denervated with an irrigated radiofrequency catheter with multiple helically arrayed electrodes. Nerve effects and ablation geometries at 7 days were characterized histomorphometrically and correlated with associated renal norepinephrine levels. Norepinephrine exhibited a threshold dependence on the percentage of affected nerves across the range of treatment durations (30-60 s) and power set points (6-20 W). For 15 W/30 s treatments, norepinephrine reduction and percentage of affected nerves tracked with number of electrode treatments, confirming additive effects of helically staggered ablations. Threshold effects were only attained when ≥4 electrodes were powered. Histomorphometry and computational modeling both illustrated that radiofrequency treatments directed at large neighboring veins resulted in subaverage ablation areas and, therefore, contributed suboptimally to efficacy. Account for measured nerve distribution patterns and the annular geometry of the artery revealed that, regardless of treatment variables, total ablation area and circumferential coverage were the prime determinants of renal denervation efficacy, with increased efficacy at smaller diameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tzafriri et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: