Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purified cellulose (approximately 100-mesh) and samples wet-ball-milled 6, 24, and 96 hr. were used as substrates for in vitro fermentations with rmnen cellulolytic bacteria. Rates of digestion were compared by taking samples at 6, 12, 22, 30, and 48 hr. The data suggested that when maximum cellulose digestion is occurring, and the substrate is nonlimiting, cellulose digestion of the different samples is oecmwing at a similar rate. The apparently faster digestion rate of the ball-milled cellulose appears to be caused by a reduction of the lag phase. Possible explanations for this are discussed. An in vitro method using calibrated large flasks, which can be sampled at various time intervals, is also described.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
B. A. Dehority (1961) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: