Why the study?
Does vaccination with OPV or IPV induce different antibody responses to antigenic sites 1 and 3 of serotype 3 poliovirus compared to each other and natural infection?
Does vaccination with OPV or IPV induce different antibody responses to antigenic sites 1 and 3 of serotype 3 poliovirus compared to each other and natural infection?
Both OPV and IPV induce site 1- and site 3-specific antibodies to serotype 3 poliovirus, though OPV induces a higher rate of site 3-specific antibodies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Suggests OPV may induce stronger site 3 responses than IPV; leaves open correlation with serotype 3 protection.
Three important antigenic sites involved in virus neutralization on polioviruses in mouse experiments have been identified. These sites are located at the surface of the virion and have been designated antigenic sites 1, 2, and 3. In mice, the antibody response to antigenic site 1 of serotype 3 poliovirus is considered to be immunodominant, but little is known about the immunogenicity of these sites in humans. In the present study, we developed inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays specific for antigenic sites 1 and 3 to measure antibody responses to these sites in fully vaccinated inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) (n = 63) and oral live attenuated poliovirus vaccine (OPV) (n = 63) recipients and in naturally infected persons (n = 25). Similar levels of antibodies to site 1 in IPV and OPV vaccinees were detected. However, significantly more OPV recipients (88.7%) had detectable antibodies to antigenic site 3 (P < 0.01) than did IPV-vaccinated persons (63. 1%). After an IPV booster vaccination, both previously IPV- and OPV-vaccinated persons responded with a significant increase in antibodies to sites 1 and 3 (P < 0.01). We conclude that the immune response to serotype 3 poliovirus in humans consists of both site 1- and site 3-specific antibodies and that these responses can be induced by either OPV or recent IPV vaccination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herremans et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: