Why the study?
Exercise is associated with sustained ventricular arrhythmias in ARVC but is not included in the ARVC risk calculator. This study evaluated whether exercise influences incident VA risk and warrants adjusting the calculator.
Does exercise history improve the prediction of incident sustained ventricular arrhythmias in patients with ARVC using the ARVC risk calculator?
Does exercise history improve the prediction of incident sustained ventricular arrhythmias in patients with ARVC using the ARVC risk calculator?
Exercise history prior to diagnosis does not provide incremental prognostic value over the existing ARVC risk calculator for predicting sustained ventricular arrhythmias.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Athlete status adds no value to ARVC risk prediction; leaves open whether refined exercise metrics warrant testing in prospective models.
BACKGROUND: Exercise is associated with sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (ARVC) but is not included in the ARVC risk calculator (arvcrisk.com). The objective of this study is to quantify the influence of exercise at diagnosis on incident VA risk and evaluate whether the risk calculator needs adjustment for exercise. METHODS: We interviewed ARVC patients without sustained VA at diagnosis about their exercise history. The relationship between exercise dose 3 years preceding diagnosis (average METh/wk) and incident VA during follow-up was analyzed with time-to-event analysis. The incremental prognostic value of exercise to the risk calculator was evaluated by Cox models. RESULTS: We included 176 patients (male, 43.2%; age, 37.6±16.1 years) from 3 ARVC centers, of whom 53 (30.1%) developed sustained VA during 5.4 (2.7-9.7) years of follow-up. Exercise at diagnosis showed a dose-dependent nonlinear relationship with VA, with no significant risk increase <15 to 30 METh/wk. Athlete status, using 3 definitions from literature (>18, >24, and >36 METh/wk), was significantly associated with VA (hazard ratios, 2.53-2.91) but was also correlated with risk factors currently in the risk calculator model. Thus, adding athlete status to the model did not change the C index of 0.77 (0.71-0.84) and showed no significant improvement (Akaike information criterion change, <2). CONCLUSIONS: Exercise at diagnosis was dose dependently associated with risk of sustained VA in ARVC patients but only above 15 to 30 METh/wk. Exercise does not appear to have incremental prognostic value over the risk calculator. The ARVC risk calculator can be used accurately in athletic patients without modification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2022 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: