Key result
Strength exercise shows no link to sustained VA in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, unlike endurance exercise.
Why the study?
Current guidelines restrict high-intensity aerobic exercise and competitive sports in individuals with ACM or P/LP gene variants, but the impact of strength-based exercise is poorly understood.
Does strength-based exercise increase the risk of sustained ventricular arrhythmia in individuals with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy?
Cohort (n=355)
Does strength-based exercise increase the risk of sustained ventricular arrhythmia in individuals with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy?
Strength-based exercise is not associated with an increased risk of sustained ventricular arrhythmias in patients with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, suggesting it may be a safer exercise option compared to endurance sports.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“There have been a lot of questions about the safety of strength training for people living with or at risk for arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. This study opens the door to help researchers further assess this - and supports continued shifts with moving away from blanket recommendations for exercise to support personalized decision-making between physicians and patients.”
Strength training not linked to VA in ACM; leaves open whether it is safer than endurance exercise pending prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is a genetic heart disorder characterized by fibrofatty replacement of ventricular myocardium, sustained ventricular arrhythmia (VA), and elevated risk of sudden death. Current guidelines restrict high-intensity aerobic exercise and competitive sports in individuals with ACM or at risk due to pathogenic/likely-pathogenic (P/LP) gene variants; however, the impact of strength-based exercise is poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the risk of VA in individuals with ACM and/or P/LP ACM gene variants exposed to strength-based exercise. METHODS: Participants were from the Johns Hopkins ARVC Registry. Exercise exposure was assessed via telephone from age 10 through follow-up. Participants were stratified into 4 groups: dual athlete, endurance athlete, strength athlete, and sedentary. Kaplan-Meier curves visualized the impact of endurance vs strength exercise on VA risk. Cox proportional hazards regression tested independent associations between strength exercise and VA. RESULTS: 355 individuals were enrolled, with median age 34 years; 55% were dual athletes, 26% sedentary, 12% endurance athletes, and 7% strength athletes. Overall lifetime risk of VA was higher with increased aerobic exercise (dual + endurance) than without (strength + sedentary). There was no difference between dual vs endurance athletes, nor strength athletes vs sedentary. A multivariable Cox regression showed no association of VA with strength training, whereas risk of endurance exercise was significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found no association between strength exercise and risk of sustained VA. These findings support individualized risk stratification and shared decision-making in ACM care and show the need for additional studies to guide recommendations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chiampas et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (n=355). Strength-based exercise vs. Sedentary lifestyle was evaluated on Sustained ventricular arrhythmia. Strength-based exercise (7% of 355 patients) was not associated with sustained ventricular arrhythmia in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, whereas endurance exercise significantly increased risk.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: