Why the study?
Are systemic and local levels of platelet-activating factor (PAF) elevated in nonsmoking patients with periodontitis and/or coronary heart disease compared to healthy controls?
Are systemic and local levels of platelet-activating factor (PAF) elevated in nonsmoking patients with periodontitis and/or coronary heart disease compared to healthy controls?
Periodontitis is associated with elevated systemic levels of the inflammatory mediator PAF comparable to those seen in coronary heart disease, supporting a potential mechanistic link between periodontal disease and cardiovascular risk.
PAF elevation in periodontitis parallels CHD without additive effect; supports mechanistic hypothesis but leaves causal role and practice implications open.
The purpose of the present study was to investigate systemic and local levels of platelet-activating factor (PAF), a potent proinflammatory mediator implicated in cardiovascular pathophysiology in adult nonsmoking patients with periodontitis with or without coronary heart disease (CHD). Eighty-seven volunteers, 25 periodontitis patients, 19 periodontitis with CHD patients, 19 CHD patients, and 24 healthy controls were included, and periodontal conditions were assessed. Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and venous blood were collected, and PAF levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. PAF levels in serum (303.3 ± 204 pg/ml) and in GCF (26.3 ± 6 pg/μl) of the periodontitis group with CHD, the periodontitis group (serum, 302.4 ± 241 pg/ml and GCF, 26.3 ± 8 pg/μl) and the CHD group (serum, 284.7 ± 192 pg/ml and GCF, 20.8 ± 6 pg/μl) were significantly higher than the healthy control group (serum, 65.4 ± 35 pg/ml and GCF, 7.7 ± 3 pg/μl; p < 0.05). In summary, the present study could demonstrate that in patients with periodontitis, the inflammatory mediator PAF is released into serum at least in the same range as for patients with coronary heart disease. However, no additive effects were seen when both conditions were present.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: