The prevalence of definite Brugada sign in Iranian patients presenting with palpitations is 0.54%, which is higher than in some European countries but lower than in Japan.
Prevalence data in Iranian patients supports ECG vigilance for Brugada patterns; extends regional estimates but leaves open prospective outcome studies.
AIMS: Brugada syndrome is a cardiac channel abnormality that is associated with a high risk of ventricular fibrillation and sudden cardiac death and characterized by an electrocardiographic pattern of right bundle branch block and transient or persistent ST-segment elevation in leads V1-V3. No data regarding the frequency of Brugada syndrome exist in an Iranian population. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of Brugada-type ECG pattern in southern Iran. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients presenting with palpitation were enrolled in the study. A Brugada-type ECG pattern was determined according to the criteria recommended by European Heart Association Molecular Basis of Arrhythmias Study Group. A total of 3895 patients (mean age 38.2 +/- 11.9 years, 54% women) met all study criteria. One hundred patients (2.56%) had Brugada-type ECG pattern. Of these, 21 patients (0.54%) had definite Brugada sign (Type 1 or Types 2 and 3 with conversion to Type 1 following procainamide test). Of 21 patients with definite Brugada sign, eight had Brugada syndrome, four had history of syncope, two had coved-type ECG in the family, one had polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, and one had history of sudden cardiac death in the family. Five patients underwent ICD implantation. The incidence of a Brugada-type ECG pattern was 2.43% in subjects between 17 and 30 years and 0.13% in subjects >30 years (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Frequency of Brugada sign in an Iranian population presenting with palpitation is greater than some European countries and lower than a Japanese urban population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bigi et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: