Why the study?
Current myocardial strain studies primarily focus on patients with sinus rhythm because conventional MR scanning sequences yield inadequate image quality in arrhythmias.
Does 3T MR with real-time TPAT improve the assessment of left ventricular myocardial strain and image quality compared to conventional cine sequence in patients with arrhythmia?
Does 3T MR with real-time TPAT improve the assessment of left ventricular myocardial strain and image quality compared to conventional cine sequence in patients with arrhythmia?
Real-time TPAT cine sequence on 3T MRI provides better image quality and effective detection of left ventricular myocardial deformation in patients with arrhythmias compared to conventional sequences.
May support real-time TPAT for LV strain assessment in arrhythmia; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Most of the current studies on myocardial strain are mainly applied in patients with sinus rhythm because the image quality of arrhythmias obtained with conventional scanning sequences does not meet diagnostic needs. Here, we intend to assess left ventricular (LV) global myocardial strain in patients with arrhythmias with 3 Tesla magnetic resonance (MR) and a new cine sequence. Thirty-three patients with arrhythmia and forty-eight subjects with sinus rhythm were enrolled in the study. LV myocardial thickness, cardiac function, myocardial strain and the apparent contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were all measured and compared using images generated by the real-time temporal parallel acquisition technique (TPAT) and the conventional cine sequence. In the arrhythmia group, the image quality of real-time TPAT was significantly better than that of the conventional cine sequence. In the arrhythmia group, the LV global peak radial strain and global peak circumferential strain values of real-time TPAT were significantly different from those of the conventional technique (radial strain, conventional: 20.27 ± 15.39 vs. TPAT: 24.14 ± 15.85, p = 0.007; circumferential strain, conventional:-12.06 ± 6.60 vs. TPAT: -13.71 ± 6.31, p = 0.015). There was no significant difference in global peak longitudinal strain between real-time TPAT and the conventional technique (-10.94 ± 4.66 vs. -10.70 ± 5.96, p = 0.771). There was no significant difference in the cardiac function parameters between the two techniques (p > 0.05), but there was a significant difference in 12 segments of the LV wall thickness between the two sequences (p < 0.05). In the sinus rhythm group, image quality using real-time TPAT was comparable to that using the conventional technique, and there was no significant difference in any of the indices (p > 0.05). Real-time TPAT is an effective method for detection of left ventricular myocardial deformation in patients with arrhythmia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: