Why the study?
Heart failure impairs quality of life and places a burden on public resources, but the health benefits and cost effects of home-based case management versus outpatient clinic follow-up remained unquantified.
Does case management at home improve QALYs and reduce costs compared to outpatient clinic follow-up in heart failure patients?
Does case management at home improve QALYs and reduce costs compared to outpatient clinic follow-up in heart failure patients?
Case management at home for heart failure patients is a cost-effective strategy that increases QALYs and reduces costs compared to standard outpatient clinic follow-up.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support home case management for cost savings in HF; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
AIMS: Heart failure reduces quality of life and life expectancy; hospital admissions are frequent and create a burden on public resources. This study aims to quantify the benefits in terms of health effects [quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)] and costs when heart failure patients receive case management at home compared with outpatient cardiology clinic follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: A health state transition (Markov) model was written, and transition probabilities were derived from a cohort of 1114 patients and available literature. QALYs in different health states of heart failure patients were retrieved from the literature, and costs were estimated with data from the financial department of the Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep and public cost sources. Monthly simulation cycles were repeated 60 times to generate 5 years of virtual follow-up data. Baseline willingness to pay is assumed €50 000 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses were performed in a one-way deterministic and a multiway probabilistic approach; the probabilistic approach used uniform and more plausible distributions of the model parameters. Case management reduced costs by €382 and increased QALYs by 0.261 for the baseline simulation; this results in a net monetary benefit of €13 428. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis based on uniform and most plausible distributions of parameters resulted in 96.2% and 83.3% of the simulations, favouring a treatment strategy of case management. CONCLUSIONS: Case management is cost effective in 83.3% of the probabilistic simulations and has a tendency towards reducing costs and increasing QALYs when considering a real-world cohort of heart failure patients in the Netherlands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Voorst et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: