Why the study?
Do permanent vena cava filters reduce the risk of pulmonary embolism and improve survival in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis?
Population
400 patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis with or without pulmonary embolism
Comparison
Permanent vena cava filter in addition to… vs Standard anticoagulant treatment for at least 3…
Design
RCT, Randomized, Events reviewed blindly by an independent committee
Follow-up
8 years
Loading...
Supports avoiding routine filters in proximal DVT; reinforces PE reduction offset by higher DVT without survival benefit.
Do permanent vena cava filters reduce the risk of pulmonary embolism and improve survival in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis?
Permanent vena cava filters reduce the long-term risk of pulmonary embolism but increase the risk of deep-vein thrombosis without improving survival, suggesting they should not be used systematically in general VTE patients.
A 2005 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: