Key result
The real-time NASBA assay demonstrated a 45.8% positive rate for enterovirus detection, significantly higher than the 22.9% rate of the first real-time RT-PCR (p=0.0008).
Why the study?
Does the real-time NASBA assay perform comparably to real-time nested RT-PCR for enterovirus detection in patients suspected of aseptic meningitis?
Cross-Sectional (n=96)
No
Does the real-time NASBA assay perform comparably to real-time nested RT-PCR for enterovirus detection in patients suspected of aseptic meningitis?
Absolute Event Rate: 45.8% vs 22.9%
p-value: p=0.0008
The real-time NASBA assay is an effective and simple method for the rapid diagnosis of enterovirus in aseptic meningitis, with less cross-contamination risk than nested RT-PCR.
Background Enteroviruses are the most frequent etiologic agents of aseptic meningitis and are estimated to be the cause of 70% to 90% of viral meningitis cases. Enterovirus diagnosis can be difficult because clinical features vary according to patient immunity and age. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the realtime nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) assay compared to that of the realtime nested RT-PCR assay for enterovirus detection. Methods This study was performed on 96 patients suspected of aseptic meningitis based on clinical features. RNA was extracted using NucliSENS EasyMAG and realtime NASBA assay was performed using NucliSENS EasyQ Enterovirus and NucliSENS EasyQ Basic 2. We also executed in-house realtime nested RT-PCR assay for RNA extracted via QIAamp Viral RNA Mini. Results The positive rate of realtime NASBA assay was 45.8% for enterovirus detection. The positive rate of first realtime reverse transcription PCR was 22.9% and the second realtime PCR was 57.3%. The concordant rate of the realtime NASBA assay and first realtime reverse transcription PCR was 75.0%. The concordant rate of the realtime NASBA assay and second realtime PCR was 86.5%. Conclusion The detection of enteroviruses using the realtime NASBA assay is less prone to cross-contamination and is simple, without the need for reverse transcription. We conclude that the NASBA assay is an effective method for the rapid diagnosis of aseptic meningitis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jun et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in Suspected aseptic meningitis (n=96). Real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) assay vs. First real-time reverse transcription PCR was evaluated on Positive rate for enterovirus detection (p=0.0008). The real-time NASBA assay demonstrated a 45.8% positive rate for enterovirus detection, significantly higher than the 22.9% rate of the first real-time RT-PCR (p=0.0008).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: