Key result
The HNB-LAMP-CRISPR assay demonstrated 95.7% accuracy for detecting enteroviruses and 100% accuracy for enterovirus A71 compared to standard RT-qPCR in clinical samples.
Why the study?
Severe enterovirus infections are often linked to EV-A71, but the CRISPR/Cas12a diagnostic system targets a single sequence, preventing simultaneous detection of both EVs and EV-A71.
Does HNB-RT-LAMP coupled with CRISPR/Cas12a improve the simultaneous detection of enteroviruses and EV-A71 compared to qPCR?
Does HNB-RT-LAMP coupled with CRISPR/Cas12a improve the simultaneous detection of enteroviruses and EV-A71 compared to qPCR?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The integration of HNB-RT-LAMP with CRISPR/Cas12a provides a highly accurate, single-tube, visualized detection method for enteroviruses and EV-A71.
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Background: Enterovirus (EV) infections encompass a spectrum of diseases, with severe cases often linked to enterovirus A71 (EV-A71), highlighting its significance in EV screening. Although the CRISPR/Cas12a diagnostic system shows promise in nucleic acid detection, enhancing specificity and sensitivity when combined with reverse transcription-loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP), its limitation lies in targeting a single sequence, thus preventing the simultaneous detection of both EVs and EV-A71. Results: This study presents a novel one-tube strategy by integrating HNB (hydroxynaphthol blue)-RT-LAMP with CRISPR/Cas12a for the simultaneous detection of EVs and EV-A71 in a single tube. The assay initially detects EVs using an HNB colorimetric approach under natural light, followed by the specific detection of EV-A71 through CRISPR/Cas12a under blue light. The limit of detection for EVs was 10 copies/μL, and for EV-A71, it was 1 copy/μL. Clinical sample assays demonstrated that, compared to qPCR, the accuracy of HNB-LAMP-CRISPR detection for EVs and EV-A71 was 95.7 and 100%, respectively. Significance: In summary, this strategy offers a reliable and user-friendly approach for EV screening. Also worth mentioning is that the provided method has beneficial effects on rapid visualized detection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhuang et al. (2025) studied Suspected Hand Foot and Mouth Disease (HFMD) (n=94). HNB-LAMP-CRISPR assay vs. RT-qPCR was evaluated on Accuracy for detecting enteroviruses. The HNB-LAMP-CRISPR assay demonstrated 95.7% accuracy for detecting enteroviruses and 100% accuracy for enterovirus A71 compared to standard RT-qPCR in clinical samples.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: