Key result
Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI) was a weak indicator of visceral adipose tissue accumulation (AUC 0.61) and did not predict changes in VAT after weight loss better than BMI or waist circumference.
Why the study?
Does the Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI) accurately predict visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and cardiometabolic risk factors in overweight and postmenopausal women?
Observational (n=99)
Yes
Does the Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI) accurately predict visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and cardiometabolic risk factors in overweight and postmenopausal women?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.61
p-value: p=< 0.01
The Visceral Adiposity Index is a weak indicator of visceral adipose tissue function and is not superior to BMI or waist circumference for predicting changes in VAT after weight loss, though it remains a good indicator of metabolic syndrome.
VAI should not supplant BMI or waist circumference for VAT monitoring in postmenopausal women; leaves open its utility for metabolic syndrome prediction.
A recent study suggested visceral adipose index (VAI) as an indicator of adipose tissue distribution and function associated with cardiometabolic risk. We aim to examine the association between VAI and visceral adipose tissue (VAT), insulin sensitivity, and a large panel of associated cardiometabolic risk factors, and to determine if changes in VAI after weight loss intervention will reflect changes in VAT. We performed a secondary analysis using the data of 99 overweight and postmenopausal women that completed a 6-month weight loss program (Montreal Ottawa New Emerging Team Study). VAI was calculated according to the equation by Amato et al. (2010; Diabetes Care, 33(4):920-922). At baseline, VAI was associated with VAT (r = 0.284, p < 0.01) but not with subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) while body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) were significantly related to both. BMI and WC demonstrated significantly stronger predictive value of VAT accumulation (area under the curve = 0.84 and 0.86, respectively) than VAI (area under the curve = 0.61; p < 0.01). However, VAT, BMI, WC, and VAI were similarly related to fasting insulin and glucose disposal rates. After a 6-month weight loss program, VAI decreased significantly and similarly in both intervention groups (p < 0.01). In addition, the percentage of change in VAI showed the significantly weakest correlation (r = 0.25) with the percentage of change in VAT than BMI (r = 0.56; p < 0.01 for r comparisons) and was not a significant predictor of interindividual percentage of change in VAT while BMI accounted for 33.7%. VAI is a weak indicator of VAT function and did not predict changes in VAT after weight loss. Furthermore, this index was not superior to BMI or WC. However, VAI is a good indicator of metabolic syndrome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elisha et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Overweight and postmenopausal (n=99). Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI) vs. Body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) was evaluated on Predictive value of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) accumulation (AUC 0.61, p=< 0.01). Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI) was a weak indicator of visceral adipose tissue accumulation (AUC 0.61) and did not predict changes in VAT after weight loss better than BMI or waist circumference.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: