Observational (n=82)
Effect estimate: AUC 0.68
NT-proBNP is significantly elevated in the hyperacute phase of NSTE-ACS compared to STE-ACS, suggesting its utility as an early, sensitive marker for myocardial ischemia in NSTE-ACS patients.
The study aimed to evaluate the differences in secretion of NT-proBNP and conventional cardiac markers in patients with STE-ACS vs NSTE-ACS as a trial to solve the dilemma of the early detection of myocardial ischemia in NSTE-ACS. Sixty two patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) divided into 2 groups according to ECG: group1 with elevated ST segment in ECG (STE-ACS) and group 2 with non elevated ST segment (NSTE-ACS).Twenty healthy subjects with matched age and sex were enrolled as control group in this study. In the sera of all subjects, levels of NT –proBNP, CK-MB and troponin-T were measured by different kits. CK-MB and TnT were both significantly higher in STE-ACS patients compared to NSTE-ACS patients. Conversely, NT-proBNP was significantly higher in NSTE-ACS patients than STE-ACS especially within 4 hours from onset of chest pain. Comparison between NT-proBNP, TnT and CK-MB levels by ROC curves revealed area under the curves = 0.68, 0.31, 0.17 respectively. NT-proBNP at cutoff 415 pg/mL in NSTE-ACS patients had higher sensitivity and specificity (92%, 39%; respectively) than other markers that will help in earl diagnosis of NSTE-ACS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salama et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Acute Coronary Syndrome (n=82). NSTE-ACS vs. STE-ACS was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy of NT-proBNP for NSTE-ACS (AUC 0.68).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: