Key result
Noninvasive cardiac output measurement using NICOM was more precise than thermodilution (coefficient of variation 3.5% vs 9.6%, p<0.001) in patients with pulmonary hypertension.
Why the study?
Does a bioreactance-based noninvasive cardiac output monitor (NICOM) accurately and precisely measure cardiac output compared to invasive thermodilution and Fick methods in patients with pulmonary hypertension?
Observational (n=50)
Does a bioreactance-based noninvasive cardiac output monitor (NICOM) accurately and precisely measure cardiac output compared to invasive thermodilution and Fick methods in patients with pulmonary hypertension?
Absolute Event Rate: 3.5% vs 9.6%
p-value: p=<0.001
Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring using bioreactance is precise and reliably measures cardiac output at rest and during vasodilator challenge in patients with pulmonary hypertension.
May support noninvasive monitoring in pulmonary hypertension; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation against Fick and outcomes.
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is characterised by a progressive decline in cardiac output (CO) and right heart failure. NICOM® (noninvasive cardiac output monitor) is a bioreactance-based technology that has been broadly validated, but its specific application in right heart failure and PH is unknown. Cardiac catheterisation was performed in 50 consecutive patients with PH. CO measurements were performed using three different methods (thermodilution, Fick and NICOM) at baseline and after vasodilator challenge. We compared the precision (coefficient of variation) and accuracy of NICOM compared to thermodilution and Fick. The mean CO (L·min(-1)) at baseline as measured by the three methods was 4.73±1.15 (NICOM), 5.69±1.74 (thermodilution) and 4.84±1.39 (Fick). CO measured by NICOM was more precise than by thermodilution (3.5±0.3% versus 9.6±6.1%, p<0.001). Bland-Altman analyses comparing NICOM to thermodilution and Fick revealed bias and 95% limits of agreement that were comparable to those comparing Fick to thermodilution. All three CO methods detected an increase in CO in response to vasodilator challenge. CO measured via NICOM is precise and reliably measures CO at rest and changes in CO with vasodilator challenge in patients with PH. NICOM may allow for the noninvasive haemodynamic assessment of patients with PH and their response to therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rich et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Pulmonary hypertension (n=50). NICOM (noninvasive cardiac output monitor) vs. Thermodilution and Fick methods was evaluated on Precision (coefficient of variation) of cardiac output measurement (p=<0.001). Noninvasive cardiac output measurement using NICOM was more precise than thermodilution (coefficient of variation 3.5% vs 9.6%, p<0.001) in patients with pulmonary hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: