Why the study?
Does a direct biochemical assay (FACE) provide more accurate measurement of unfractionated heparin compared to biological clotting assays?
Does a direct biochemical assay (FACE) provide more accurate measurement of unfractionated heparin compared to biological clotting assays?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A novel direct biochemical assay (FACE) for unfractionated heparin reveals different pharmacokinetic profiles and suggests biological clotting assays may overestimate heparin concentrations.
A number of investigations have noted that functional biological assays for heparin are not always reliable and may not reflect the actual biochemical level of heparin in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy. This creates the possibility that patients receiving anticoagulant treatment may have an excess or deficiency of circulating levels of heparin. To address this problem, we have developed a direct biochemical measurement of heparin. The heparin assay uses fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis (FACE) to directly measure the predominate disaccharide of unfractionated heparin. In this study, unfractionated heparin was measured in vitro throughout a wide range of heparin concentrations in plasma. Seven in vivo pharmacokinetic studies in five normal subjects given 3,000 USP units of unfractionated heparin intravenously showed a three-phase elimination process with higher peak plasma levels and shorter elimination times than predicted from previous studies. At these doses, heparin is largely eliminated intact through urinary excretion. Body weight has a significant effect on heparin kinetics. When we compared the direct biochemical assay with two biological clotting assays, we found the latter can overestimate biochemical heparin concentrations. The FACE assay, due to its sensitivity, is also able to measure circulating levels of endogenous heparin in plasma and urine. Direct heparin measurement using the FACE technique is practical and useful for studies of the correlation of biochemical and biological activities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mielke et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: